Contact
+ Contact Form
Search
+ Search Form
Introduction
+ Aims & Scope
+ Structure
+ History
Announcements
+ Updates
+ Calls for Papers
+ New Lectures
+ New Publications
Alphabetical Index
+ Author Index
+ Speaker Index
Chronological Index
+ Ancient History
+ Medieval History
+ Modern History
Geographical Index
+ African History
+ American History
+ Asian History
+ European History
+ Oceanian History
Topical Index
+ Prosecution
+ Cases
+ Types
+ Offenders
+ Victims
+ Society
+ Research
+ Representations
Resources
+ Institutions
+ Literature Search
+ Research
|
Start:
Alphabetical Index:
Author Index:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
Unknown
First published: September 1, 2024 - Last updated: September 1, 2024
TITLE INFORMATION
Author: David Lederer
Title: The Myth of the All-Destructive War
Subtitle: Afterthoughts on German Suffering, 1618–1648
Journal: German History: The Journal of the German History Society
Volume: 29
Issue: 3
Year: September 2011
Pages: 380-403
pISSN: 0266-3554 -
Find a Library: WorldCat |
eISSN: 1477-089X -
Find a Library: WorldCat
Language: English
Keywords:
Modern History:
17th Century |
European History:
German History |
Cases:
Real Incidents /
Sack of Magdeburg;
Types:
Wartime Sexual Violence /
Thirty Years' War
FULL TEXT
Link:
Oxford Academic (Restricted Access)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Author:
David Lederer,
Department of History,
Maynooth University, National University of Ireland
Abstract:
»Like perhaps no other military struggle in German history, the Thirty Years War exemplifies a conflagration largely defined by immense suffering. It offers an optimal testcase for the analysis of suffering as an emotional category by historians. In the twentieth century, some (such as Dame C.V. Wedgewood or the SS officer Günther Franz) employed a political frame of reference to more recent events in German history. One of the inadequacies of this interpretative framework is its tendency to moralize and over-simplify the roles of victims and perpetrators. In fact, we now recognize that most suffering during the Thirty Years War related only indirectly to military conflict, resulting instead from economic disaster, famine and disease. As a direct outcome of the war, rape poignantly illustrates methodological difficulties facing historians of suffering, given the patriarchal character of seventeenth-century society. The present historiography overcomes a variety of obstacles through micro-historic methods employing so-called ego-documents and Selbstzeugnisse. Theoretically, William Reddy’s exploration of hyperbolic sentimentality during the French Revolution may offer us a better analytical framework for understanding suffering during the Thirty Years War. In our case, a hyperbolic sensitivity to suffering shared by victims and non-victims alike contributed to the cessation of hostilities at Münster/Osnabrück and enshrined principles of sovereignty and religious tolerance in the Western political vocabulary. Thus elevated, the mechanisms of emotional suffering assume a central explanatory role in our understanding of the Thirty Years War.«
(Source: German History)
Contents:
|
I: Do Germans Suffer? (p. 380) |
|
II: The Rape of Madgeburg, or ‘Do Historians Create Historical Suffering’? (p. 387) |
|
III: Suffering, Experience, Memory and the Struggle for Order (p. 395) |
|
IV: Baroque Suffering as Hyper-Cognized Expressions of Grief? (p. 400) |
|
Abstract (p. 403) |
Wikipedia:
History of Europe:
History of Germany /
Germany in the early modern period |
Sex and the law:
Rape /
Wartime sexual violence |
War:
Thirty Years' War /
Sack of Magdeburg
|